An acoustical analysis of Apple’s HomePod published Wednesday found the speaker boasts a relatively flat frequency response, characteristics often associated with accurate sound reproduction, but those results might be misleading.
HomePod frequency response. Source: NTi via Fast Company
In the third and final installment of its HomePod review, Fast Company tested frequency response using specialized hardware and software from NTi Audio, an acoustic evaluation specialist based in Liechtenstein.
With HomePod set up in a typical living room, the publication saw the device deliver what is characterized as a flat response, meaning the magnitude and phase of output was for the most part in line with input across the frequency spectrum.
Specifically, HomePod output lies within 4 decibels of flat between 70Hz and 6KHz. Further, Total Harmonic Distortion, which in basic terms can be defined as a calculation measuring the difference between a source signal and observed speaker output, was notably slim.
“We found distortion of less than 10% from the 40 Hz to 10,000 Hz range, which is very good, and less than 2.5% from 150 Hz to 10,000 Hz, which is excellent,” according to Brian MacMillan, associate general manager at NTi.
The results are similar to measurements seen by Reddit user “WinterCharm,” who ran HomePod through a gamut of tests over the weekend and also found the speaker to reproduce “near-perfectly flat” sound.
Both tests found steep decreases in output at the high end of the spectrum, just shy of its 20KHz range limit. The Fast Company evaluation saw its test unit begin to taper on the low end at around 60Hz, results not shown in the Reddit test. And therein lies the problem.
As noted by Reddit user “edechamps” in response to WinterCharm’s rundown, acoustic testing was performed in a reverberant room without any apparent steps taken to reduce reflections such as impulse response windowing. Further, the graph in the Reddit post was presented at a scale that does not provide enough granularity to make accurate comparisons.
Whether Fast Company implemented windowing in its procedure is unknown, but the publication did perform multiple measurements from different points of the evaluation room. Still, as the test was not conducted in a controlled environment free of reverberations, its results are questionable.
As edechamps puts it, any conclusion gleaned from a frequency response evaluation that is not performed in an anechoic chamber, or does not attempt to nullify real-world , should be taken with a hefty grain of salt.