Every few years, we see a new Apple device like the HomePod, the AirPods, the Apple Watch, and so on back to the iPhone and the iPad. We also see the company spending ever more sums on research and development. Yet what we don’t see and it appears we never will is any correlation between these two things. HomePod, for instance, was announced in June 2017 but you can’t find a spending hike six months, a year, or even two years earlier.
It’s very tempting to try, though, and most especially so this week when Apple announced that it has spent $760 million more on R&D than it did this time last year. That brings this third fiscal quarter’s spend to $3.7 billion.
At the same time, we are rumored to see three new iPhones, possibly also new iPads, and perhaps also new Apple Watches before the end of the year. These are still just rumors but they’re not the only ones: it’s also possible that we’ll see new iMacs, a new Mac mini, and hopefully at least a glimpse of the promised Mac Pro.
Even if we get a fraction of these, it’s going to be a busy year for Apple. It’s easy to assume this is why it has been spending more on research and development but it doesn’t appear to be true.
While Apple’s earnings have spiked with clear and notable rises in the Christmas periods over the last many years, R&D has just quietly gone about its business.
You can see two spikes around the first quarters of 2017 and 2018. But, they’re not big and they are both eclipsed by the steady rise that continued after them.
Given the industry, it’s not a surprise that Apple treads R&D seriously. So it’s also not a surprise that it would be awarded more funds when those funds are available. What is a surprise is that almost every single one of Apple’s major competitors spends more and sometimes much more than it does.
Bernstein Research, a firm that claims to have been ranked first for “Best Knowledge of US Companies and Industries for 14 Straight Years” thinks Apple is doing it wrong.
In a Bernstein analysis reported on by financial site Barrons, Analyst Toni Sacconaghi says: “While Apple’s current R&D spending is large, our benchmarking analysis suggests that Apple appears to still be underspending on R&D today, perhaps by a factor of 2x.”
There is some backing to the analysis. “We examined Apple and the next 25 largest tech companies,” he continued, “and found a somewhat strong correlation between R&D as a percent of revenue and gross margin.”
Speaking before this week’s results, he said Bernstein estimated that Apple spent 5.1 percent of its revenue on R&D which is less than its rivals. “Apple could double its R&D and be relatively inline with peers”.
Back in April in a report specifically about US technology firms, Recode reported that Amazon spent $22.6 billion on R&D last year, up 41 percent from 2016. The same data said Google’s Alphabet spent $16.6B.
Then, Intel had spent $13.1B and Microsoft $12.3B. For the same period, Statista.com reports that Samsung spent $12.7 billion.
None of these companies are having the kind of earnings reports that Apple continues to have.
Previously Apple has underspent on R&D compared to every competitor but the fact that it’s matched Samsung this time is likely to again to be down to how much money it has to invest. Apple treats R&D seriously —but it famously hasn’t thrown money at it.
In 1998, Steve Jobs told Fortune magazine: “Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have.”
“When Apple came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D,” added Jobs. “It’s not about money. It’s about the people you have, how you’re led, and how much you get it.”
Apple’s research and development spending not only does not peak when a new product is imminent, it doesn’t dip during the quiet times. It just keeps on funding whatever Apple’s working on, at any given moment.
That’s the driving force here, the need to spend what needs to be spent in order to achieve whatever product Apple is working on. The company clearly won’t double its R&D spend because an analyst says everyone else is. And so far, Apple’s approach is working well for it and has been for those 40 quarters.