- Andy Rubin — the so-called “Father of Android” — resigned from Google’s Android team in 2014.
- In November last year, news broke that Rubin was actually asked to resign following a sexual misconduct claim against him.
- Now, we have information leading us to believe Google not only brushed aside the credible claim, but also gave Rubin a $90 million parting gift.
When Andy Rubin — the so-called “Father of Android” who was the primary developer of the world’s largest mobile operating system — resigned from the Google Android team in 2014, he was given a fond farewell.
“I want to wish Andy all the best with what’s next,” Larry Page, Google’s then-CEO, said in a public statement. “With Android he created something truly remarkable — with a billion-plus happy users.”
On his way out of Google’s door, Rubin received a parting gift: $90 million paid out over monthly installments of $2 million. The final payment is expected next month.
However, in November of last year, news broke that the “resignation” wasn’t quite so simple. According to anonymous sources familiar with the matter, Rubin was actually forced to resign after having an inappropriate sexual relationship with a female subordinate on the Google Android team.
While Rubin’s forced exit from Google was known in November last year, we are now just learning about this $90 million gift from Google, which the company would not have had to pay if it had fired Rubin instead of forcing him to resign.
According to The New York Times report on the matter, Rubin is actually one of three known male executives who received credible claims of sexual misconduct against them and were either given huge parting gifts on their resignation or — in one case — allowed to continue high-paying work with the company.
To make matters worse, Google is also a major investor in Essential.
Andy Rubin didn’t just leave Google — he was given the choice to be fired or resign. He resigned and got a huge payout for it.
Rubin’s transgression at Google allegedly stems from an extramarital sexual liaison he had with a female subordinate in a hotel room. Although the act is assumed to be consensual, Google — like many companies — has strict policies against sexual relationships with subordinates due to the ethical and legal concerns which stem from those situations.
Eileen Naughton, Google’s vice president for people operations, said in a statement, “We investigate and take action, including termination. In recent years, we’ve taken a particularly hard line on inappropriate conduct by people in positions of authority. We’re working hard to keep improving how we handle this type of behavior.”
While this policy no doubt exists, it appears from this new information Google overlooked the policy in Rubin’s case.
The rest of The New York Times exposé delves into the working culture at Google, where it is alleged high-ranking male employees are given soft punishments (or none at all) for violations of company policy, even when it comes to sexual misconduct. In Rubin’s case, there were many red flags which should have made Google at the very least keep a close eye on him, but instead, he was continually praised and financially rewarded.
Click the button below to read the whole article: